Ventura
Ventura v. Bondi
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SILVIA ARACELY VENTURA; et al., No. 24-4176 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A208-576-240
A208-576-241
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 21, 2025**
Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Silvia Aracely Ventura and her son, natives and citizens of El Salvador,
petition pro se for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)
affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their
applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.