Safadi

Safadi v. County of Snohomish

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 202524-2550California276 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMAR SAFADI, No. 24-2550 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-00887-RAJ v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH;

SNOHOMISH COUNTY OFFICE OF THE

PROSECUTING ATTORNEY;

SNOHOMISH COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Amar Safadi appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging retaliation, excessive force, and improper

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). hiring by Snohomish County after he was arrested, prosecuted, and incarcerated

several times. We have jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.