Safadi
Safadi v. County of Snohomish
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 202524-2550California276 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AMAR SAFADI, No. 24-2550 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-00887-RAJ v.
MEMORANDUM*
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH;
SNOHOMISH COUNTY OFFICE OF THE
PROSECUTING ATTORNEY;
SNOHOMISH COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 21, 2025**
Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Amar Safadi appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging retaliation, excessive force, and improper
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). hiring by Snohomish County after he was arrested, prosecuted, and incarcerated
several times. We have jurisdiction…