Merlos-Argueta

Merlos-Argueta v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 202524-4746California517 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARIEL ERNESTO MERLOS-ARGUETA, No. 24-4746 Agency No. Petitioner, A206-637-732 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Ariel Ernesto Merlos-Argueta, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions

pro se for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

We review for substantial evidence the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.