Frerichs

Frerichs v. Spokane Police Department

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 202524-2977California310 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JARED A. FRERICHS, No. 24-2977 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00277-TOR Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

SPOKANE POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Jared A. Frerichs appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising out of the confiscation of his

firearms. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). Webb v. Trader Joe’s Co.,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 999 F.3d 1196, 1201 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.