Daniel Gonzalez v. Department (Bureau) of Real Es

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 202521-15696California429 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL GONZALEZ, Nos. 21-15696 22-15523 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-02448-TLN-KJN v.

DEPARTMENT (BUREAU) OF REAL MEMORANDUM*

ESTATE, A California State Agency; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as successor by merger to Chase Home Finance, LLC; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Daniel Gonzalez appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing as a discovery sanction his action alleging federal and state law claims

arising from the 2010 revocation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.