Crick

Crick v. City of Globe

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 202524-3832California950 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

APRIL CARRIE CRICK; TIMOTHY LEE No. 24-3832 CRICK, husband and wife, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00978-JAT Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF GLOBE, a municipal corporation; GLOBE POLICE

DEPARTMENT; RAMON HERNANDEZ,

Officer; Chief WALTERS; UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Does and Jane Does I-V; Black & White partnerships I-V; Black & White corporations I-V,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 22, 2025** San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: FRIEDLAND and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK, District Judge.***

Plaintiffs April and Timothy Crick appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.