Vashisht-Rota

Vashisht-Rota v. Ottawa University

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 202524-5962California398 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, No. 24-5962 D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00959-AGS-KSC Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

OTTAWA UNIVERSITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Andrew George Schopler, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Aparna Vashisht-Rota appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her diversity action alleging various employment-related claims. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Mudpie, Inc.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.