Perry
Perry v. Stuart
Opinion
Opinion
Danner, J.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Facts
Ogen and Dorit Perry are general partners of Dahlex LP, a California limited partnership. 4 Dorit owns a Roth IRA account for which she “make[s]
3 We take these facts from the Perrys’ petition for writ of mandate
(petition) and the parties’ filings submitted in the trial court in connection with the petition, amended petition (defined post), and motion for attorney fees and costs. “We recite the essential relevant facts ‘in the manner most favorable to the judgment, resolving all conflicts and drawing all inferences in favor of respondent.’ ” (Nwosu v. Uba (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 1229, 1233, fn. 2; Haydon v. Elegance at Dublin (2023) 97 Cal.App.5th 1280, 1287.) Both parties submitted evidentiary objections to the trial court, and we disregard any evidence to which the court sustained an objection. 4 A limited partnership “can generally be described as a type of
partnership comprised of one or more general partners who manage the business and who are personally liable for partnership debts, and one or more limited partners who contribute capital and share in the profits, but who take no part in running the business and incur no…