Escamilla

Escamilla v. Perry CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 27, 2025G063857California5,194 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/27/25 Escamilla v. Perry CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

DANIEL ESCAMILLA,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G063857

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2023-01321288)

MICHAEL RAYMOND PERRY et al., OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Deborah C. Servino, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions. Law Offices of Seth M. Goldberg and Seth M. Goldberg for Plaintiff and Appellant. The Perry Law Firm, Matthew J. Bertolucci, and Larry M. Roberts for Defendants and Respondents. * * * This case arises from a judgment of dismissal following an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.