K.

K. v. Sonoma County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20253:22-cv-01202California441 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 MICHELLE K., et al., Case No. 22-cv-01202-AMO (RMI)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER ON JOINT LETTER BRIEF

v. Re: Dkt. No. 338 COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Defendants.

13 Before the court is a joint letter brief filed “concerning the deposition of Dr. Virginia Crossleysmith and whether the psychotherapist-patient privilege protects [Defendant] Gina Centeno’s communications with Dr. Crossleysmith.” (Dkt. 338, p. 1). The court finds the matter suitable for disposition without a hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Defendants seek to take the deposition of Dr. Crossleysmith, but Dr. Crossleysmith is concerned that sitting for a deposition may violate her obligations under California’s psychotherapist-patient confidentiality requirements and subject her to prosecution. The court finds that the deposition should go forward on two bases. First, Gina Centeno waived the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.