(SS) Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security

FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

4 Plaintiff applied for Title XVI Supplemental Security Income on March 4, 2019, alleging that 5 she became disabled on January 1, 2019. AR 225-233. The claim was denied initially on June 17, 6 2019, and on reconsideration on December 4, 2019. AR 94-97; 104-109. Plaintiff requested a hearing 7 before an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) and ALJ William Bezego held a hearing on February 11, 8 2021. AR 39-64. ALJ Bezego issued an order denying benefits on the basis that Plaintiff was not 9 disabled on March 3, 2021. AR 7-23. Plaintiff sought review of the ALJ’s decision, which the 10 Appeals Council denied. AR 1-8. This appeal followed. 11 Medical Record 12 The relevant medical record was reviewed by the Court and will be referenced below as 13 necessary to this Court’s decision. 14 The ALJ’s Decision 15 Using the Social Security Administration’s five-step sequential evaluation process, the ALJ 16 determined that Plaintiff was not disabled under the Social Security Act. AR 7-23. Specifically, the 17 ALJ found that Plaintiff had not engaged in substantial gainful activity since the application date of 18 February 22, 2019. AR 12. The ALJ…