Mayra Langarica v. Inland Valley Humane Society

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTERN DIVISION

MAYRA LANGARCIA, No. 2:25-cv-00804-JFW-BFM Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING

v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND

INLAND VALLEY HUMANE RECOMMENDATION

SOCIETY,

16 Defendant.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, the records and files herein, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. To the extent that the Objections include facts that were not included in Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint, the Court exercises its discretion not to consider those facts. Jones v. Blanas, 393 F.3d 918, 935 (9th Cir. 2004). First, the Magistrate Judge issued two previous orders highlighting the deficiencies in Plaintiff’s complaints, giving…