Shallowhorn

Shallowhorn v. Hopper

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20253:25-cv-00222California4,808 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFRED EUGENE SHALLOWHORN, Case No.: 25-cv-0222-MMA (MMP)

CDCR #P-13049,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

AND HOPPER, et al., 16 Defendants. [Doc. No. 3] 17 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT 18 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) 20 Plaintiff Alfred Eugene Shallowhorn, a state prisoner, has filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. No. 1. This action was initially dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the civil filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Doc. No. 2. Plaintiff has now filed an IFP motion. Doc. No. 3. I. IFP MOTION All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $405, consisting of a $350 statutory fee plus an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.