Doyle
Doyle v. Optum Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 ERIN KATHLEEN DOYLE, Case No. 25-cv-0575-MMA-KSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO REMAND
OPTUM SERVICES, INC., et al., [Doc. No. 6] Defendants. 18 19 20 On April 10, 2025, Plaintiff Erin Kathleen Doyle (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion to remand this action to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego. Doc. No. 6. Defendants Optum Services, Inc. and UnitedHealth Group, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a response in opposition. Doc. No. 9. On May 14, 2025, the Court found this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1, and took it under submission. Doc. No. 10. For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to remand. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, formerly employed by Defendants between…