(PC) Hunter v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20252:22-cv-01520California1,491 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRANDON EUGENE HUNTER, No. 2:22-cv-01520-DJC-JDP

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

Defendant.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action seeking

relief under 42 U.S.C. section 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 7, 2024, Magistrate Judge Peterson filed Findings and

Recommendations which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all

parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed

within fourteen days. (F. & R. (ECF No. 32).) In the Findings and Recommendations,

the Magistrate Judge recommended that the case be dismissed for failure to comply

with court orders requiring Plaintiff to respond to Defendant’s filings, and failure to

prosecute. (Id.) Plaintiff did not file an objection. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.