Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JANE DOE, No. 2:25-cv-00764-DAD-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER EL DORADO COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to appoint guardian ad litem. ECF No. 15. The 17 motion has been referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). ECF No. 21. 18 The motion recites that the parties met and conferred prior to the filing of the motion, and 19 Defendant does not intend to oppose the motion. ECF No. 15 at 2. The time for filing an 20 opposition has expired, and no opposition was filed. See LR 230(c). 21 However, the motion does not contain sufficient information for the Court to rule. The 22 motion does not include information concerning the attorney’s interest required by Local Rule 23 202(c). Nor does the motion contain sufficient information for the Court to determine that 24 Plaintiff, a 24-year old woman, is “incompetent” under Rule 17. In determining competency, the 25 Court needs to apply the following…