James Ison v. Ethan Schulman
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 28 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-16219
JAMES J. ISON; ISON LAW FIRM, PC,
Plaintiffs - Appellants, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01546-JAM-KJN v.
ETHAN P. SCHULMAN; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 23, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: BERZON, FRIEDLAND, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiffs James Ison and Ison Law Firm (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the district
court’s dismissal of their complaint without leave to amend. We have jurisdiction
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 We review the district court’s grant of a motion to dismiss de novo and the
district court’s denial of leave to amend…