Huff

Huff v. Moore

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 28, 202523-2383California352 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JORDAN HUFF, No. 23-2383 D.C. No. 1:19-cv-01248-HBK Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

THOMAS MOORE, Doctor at USP Atwater; ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, Former Warden at USP Atwater; STEVE LAKES, Warden at USP Atwater; FNU

HESS; USP ATWATER PRISON

OFFICIALS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Helena M. Barch-Kuchta, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted May 21, 2025***

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Federal prisoner Jordan Huff appeals pro se from the district court’s

summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.