Finander
Finander v. Moreno Valley Unified District
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 28 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARLENE FINANDER, No. 23-3204 D.C. No. 5:23-cv-00774-JGB-SP Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MORENO VALLEY UNIFIED
DISTRICT; DOES, I - X,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 21, 2025**
Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Marlene Finander appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing her employment action alleging federal and state law claims. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291
F.3d 639, 640 (9th Cir. 2002). We…