Buntenbah
United States v. Buntenbah
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 28 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1444 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:19-cr-00099-DKW-KJM-7 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MICHAEL BUNTENBAH, AKA Mike B,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Derrick K. Watson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 21, 2025**
Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Michael Buntenbah appeals from the district court’s judgment forfeiting his
$250,000 bond. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for
abuse of discretion, see United States v. Nguyen, 279 F.3d 1112, 1115 (9th Cir.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Buntenbah’s request for oral argument is denied. 2002), we affirm.