Buntenbah

United States v. Buntenbah

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 28, 202524-1444California393 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1444 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:19-cr-00099-DKW-KJM-7 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MICHAEL BUNTENBAH, AKA Mike B,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Derrick K. Watson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Michael Buntenbah appeals from the district court’s judgment forfeiting his

$250,000 bond. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for

abuse of discretion, see United States v. Nguyen, 279 F.3d 1112, 1115 (9th Cir.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Buntenbah’s request for oral argument is denied. 2002), we affirm.

Buntenbah contends that the district court abused its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.