Murugaiyan
Murugaiyan v. Anderson
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 28 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SENTHIL MOHAN MURUGAIYAN, No. 24-1299 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-05272-CRB v.
MEMORANDUM*
KATE ANDERSON, General Manager, ESA, Pleasanton; DUSTIN ROBERT MARTIN, District Manager; ESA
MANAGEMENT, LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 21, 2025**
Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Senthil Mohan Murugaiyan appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging various federal and state law claims arising during
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). his time at an extended stay hotel. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.