Morgan

United States v. Morgan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 28, 202524-5520California332 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-5520 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:11-cr-00090-SPW-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JOSHUA ALLEN MORGAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Joshua Allen Morgan appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 24-month sentence imposed upon the third revocation of his

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Morgan contends that the 24-month sentence is substantively unreasonable

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). because the district court elected to run it consecutively to the 262-month…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.