Jacobs

United States v. Jacobs

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 28, 202524-3806California405 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3806 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:23-cr-00258-DAD-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

TRAVON JACOBS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Travon Jacobs appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the

24-month sentence imposed following revocation of his supervised release for

seven violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Jacobs contends that the district court’s error in finding that he violated

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). supervised release by brandishing a deadly weapon requires…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.