Hedges

United States v. Hedges

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 28, 202524-6178California385 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-6178 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:15-cr-00028-DLC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

CHAD WILLIAM HEDGES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Chad William Hedges appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the sentence of 6 months’ imprisonment and 47 months’ supervised

release imposed upon the third revocation of his supervised release. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Hedges contends the district court procedurally erred by failing to explain

the sentence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.