Hall

United States v. Hall

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 28, 202524-6027California246 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-6027 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:22-cr-00150-DLC-2 v.

MEMORANDUM*

DOMINIC EARL HALL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Dominic Earl Hall appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for possession with intent to

distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

Hall’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Hall has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.