Vashisht-Rota

Vashisht-Rota v. Harrisburg University

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 28, 202524-7589California415 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, No. 24-7589 D.C. No. 3:20-cv-00967-AGS-KSC Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

HARRISBURG UNIVERSITY; OTTAWA

UNIVERSITY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Andrew George Schopler, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Aparna Vashisht-Rota appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her diversity action alleging various employment-related claims. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissal for failure to comply with court orders. In re…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.