Rickley

Rickley v. Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 28, 2025B332899California5,786 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bendix, J.

Filed 5/28/25 Rickley v. Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

REBECCA RICKLEY, et al., B332899

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC696774) v.

TESORO REFINING &

MARKETING COMPANY LLC,

et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Richard L. Fruin, Jr., Judge. Affirmed. JDP PC, Jeff Dominic Price; Law Offices of Natasha Roit and Natasha Roit for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Buchalter, Matthew S. Covington, C. Dana Hobart and Efrat M. Cogan for Defendants and Respondents. ____________________________ This is an appeal from a judgment entered after the trial court granted summary judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.