(SS) Rivers v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20251:24-cv-00836California4,436 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 TOMASENA DUREEKA RIVERS, Case No. 1:24-cv-00836-BAM 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of OBJECTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S Social Security1, DECISION TO DISMISS AS MOOT Defendant. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SANCTIONS AS MOOT

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S “MOTION

OF EVIDENCE” AS MOOT ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S “MOTION

OF REQUEST HOLD OF CONTEMPT

AGAINST DEFENDANT AND

DEFENDANT’S COUNSEL” AS MOOT

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S “MOTION

TO DISMISS DEFENDANT’S CASE” AS

MOOT

21 (Docs. 19-22, 25-26)

23 24 Plaintiff Tomasena Dureeka Rivers, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a 25 complaint on July 19, 2024, alleging that the Department of Social Security was “attempting to

1 Frank Bisignano…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.