BMO Bank N.A. v. Kular Transportation Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20251:24-cv-01568California6,418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BMO BANK N.A., Case No. 1:24-cv-01568-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT

JUDGMENT WITH REDUCTION IN

KULAR TRANSPORTATION INC., et al., ATTORNEY’S FEES

Defendants. ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE ON

DEFENDANT WITHIN THREE DAYS

17 (ECF No. 11)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS Pending before the Court is Plaintiff BMO Bank N.A.’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for default judgment. Plaintiff seeks default judgment against Defendants Kular Transportation Inc. and Lakhwinder Singh (collectively, “Defendants”) relating to Defendants’ defaults on contracts involving vehicles. No opposition to the motion was filed. On May 28, 2025, the Court held a hearing on the motion. Ken Ichi Ito, Esq., appeared on behalf of Plaintiff, and no appearance was made on behalf of Defendants. Having considered the moving papers, the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.