Banuelos
Griggs v. Banuelos
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MICHAEL GRIGGS Case No. 1:25-cv-00613-SKO
Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT; OR
JOHN BANUELOS,
(2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE Defendant. WISHES TO STAND ON HIS
COMPLAINT
15 (Doc. 1)
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
18 19 On May 23, 2025, Plaintiff Michael Griggs (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed an action. (Doc. 1.) On that same date, Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted on May 27, 2025. (Docs. 2 & 3.) Plaintiff’s complaint is now before the Court for screening. Upon review, the Court concludes that the complaint fails to state any cognizable claims. Plaintiff has the following options as to how to proceed. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint, which the Court will screen in due course. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a statement with the Court stating…