Eisenstecken

Eisenstecken v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20252:20-cv-02349California7,477 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MONICA EISENSTECKEN; TAHOE No. 2:20-cv-02349-DJC-CKD

STEWARDS, LLC; DAVID BENEDICT;

TAHOE FOR SAFER TECH; and

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ Plaintiffs, MOTIONS TO DISMISS 13 v.

TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING

AGENCY; JOANNE MARCHETTA, in her official and individual capacities; MARSHA BERKBIGLER, in her official and individual capacities; SUE NOVASEL, in her official and representative capacities; GUILLIAM NEL; SACRAMENTO VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP dba VERIZON WIRELESS; CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. 22 Defendants permitted and constructed wireless service facilities in the City of South Lake Tahoe. Plaintiffs allege that these facilities, though in compliance with federal regulations, produce unlawful radiofrequency emissions. Defendants argue all causes of action should be dismissed for failure to state a claim. The Court agrees, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.