Harrosh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Michael Harrosh, No. 2:21-cv-01969-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency; George and Virginia Johannessen, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Michael Harrosh and defendants George and Virginia Johannessen contend they 19 are all entitled to an award of the costs they incurred in this action. See Johannessens’ Bill of Costs, ECF No. 119; Harrosh Bill of Costs, ECF No. 120; see also Johannessens’ Objections, ECF No. 122; Harrosh Objections, ECF No. 123; Johannessens’ Resp., ECF No. 124. The remaining defendant, the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, does not seek an award of any costs 23 and has taken no position in the costs dispute. “Unless a federal statute, these rules,” i.e., the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “or a 25 court order provides otherwise, costs—other than attorney’s fees—should be allowed to the 26 prevailing party.” Fed. R. Civ. P.…