(PS) Cherpan v. City of Fairfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20252:23-cv-02100California673 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LORENA CHERPAN, No. 2:23-cv-02100-TLN-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF FAIRFIELD, et al., Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Withdraw filed by Pointer & Buelna, LLP 18 (“P&B”) and Nold Law, counsel for Plaintiff Lorena Cherpan (“Plaintiff”). (ECF No. 31.) 19 Defendants did not file an opposition. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the 20 motion. 21 The Local Rules of this district require an attorney who would withdraw and leave his or 22 her client without representation to obtain leave of court upon a noticed motion. E.D. Cal. L.R. 23 182(d). Local Rule 182(d) also requires an attorney to provide notice to the client and all other 24 parties who have appeared, and an affidavit stating the current or last known address of the client. 25 Id. Finally, to comply with Local Rule 182(d), the attorney must conform to the requirements of 26 the California Rules of Professional Conduct. Id. 27 / / / 28 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.