Ducilus

Ducilus v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 202524-1451California1,182 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 29 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANCELET DUCILUS, No. 24-1451 Agency No. Petitioner, 046-463-276 v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted May 12, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: BOGGS, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.**

Ancelet Ducilus, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions for review of an order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), affirming an Immigration Judge’s

(“IJ”) denial of his application for deferral of removal under the Convention Against

Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the BIA’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. factual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.