Craver

Craver v. Floyd

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 202523-2739California953 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 29 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDRE RAMON CRAVER, No. 23-2739

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-02327-WBS-DB

v.

MEMORANDUM *

C. FLOYD,

Defendant-Appellee.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 12, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: BEA and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Judge.**

Andre Craver appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor

of C. Floyd. Craver argues the district court erred by finding that Floyd was not

deliberately indifferent to his serious medical need in violation of the Eighth

Amendment and that she provided him inadequate nutrition while he was under her

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Jeffrey Vincent Brown, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.