Craver
Craver v. Floyd
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 202523-2739California953 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 29 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANDRE RAMON CRAVER, No. 23-2739
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-02327-WBS-DB
v.
MEMORANDUM *
C. FLOYD,
Defendant-Appellee.
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 12, 2025 San Francisco, California
Before: BEA and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Judge.**
Andre Craver appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor
of C. Floyd. Craver argues the district court erred by finding that Floyd was not
deliberately indifferent to his serious medical need in violation of the Eighth
Amendment and that she provided him inadequate nutrition while he was under her
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Jeffrey Vincent Brown, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by…