Benjamin O'Brien v. Frank Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 202522-36061California918 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 29 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BENJAMIN LUKE O'BRIEN, No. 22-36061

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:21-cv-00403-CWD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Candy W. Dale, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted May 29, 2025***

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER, AND BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Benjamin Luke O’Brien appeals pro se from an order of the district court

remanding for further proceedings the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). to terminate his prior award of disability insurance benefits pursuant to a

continuing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.