Apple
Apple v. Bisignano
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 29 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PATRICK A. APPLE, No. 24-307 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-05531-MLP v.
MEMORANDUM*
FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Michelle L. Peterson, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 2, 2025** Portland, Oregon
Before: BYBEE, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Patrick A. Apple appeals from a district court order affirming the
Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of his application for disability insurance
benefits. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review the district court’s order upholding the ALJ’s denial of social
security benefits de novo.…