United States v. Puig Valdes
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3214
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cr-00394- v. DMG-
YASIEL PUIG VALDES,
OPINION
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dolly M. Gee, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 13, 2024 Pasadena, California
Filed May 29, 2025
Before: Daniel P. Collins, Holly A. Thomas, and Anthony D. Johnstone, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Collins SUMMARY *
Criminal Law
In an interlocutory appeal by the Government, the panel affirmed the district court’s ruling that the factual basis of a pre-indictment plea agreement signed by Yasiel Puig Valdes (“Puig”) would be excluded at trial. Under the plea agreement, Puig would plead guilty to one count of making false statements to federal officers, and in exchange, the Government would recommend a reduced sentence and decline to bring an additional charge of obstruction of justice. When Puig later declined to plead guilty, the Government declared that Puig…