Bozzini

Bozzini v. Ferguson Enterprises LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20253:22-cv-05667California1,245 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TERA BOZZINI, et al., Case No. 22-cv-05667-AMO

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

FERGUSON ENTERPRISES LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 110 Defendants.

12 In this putative class action, Tera Bozzini and Adrian Gonzales (the “Plaintiffs”) assert claims against Ferguson Enterprises, LLC and the Retirement Plan Committee of the Ferguson Enterprises, LLC 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (together, “Defendants” or “Ferguson”) for alleged violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S. §§ 1001 et seq. Ferguson moves to dismiss the second and third causes of action asserted in the operative second amended complaint (“SAC”). It also moves to strike Plaintiffs’ jury demand.1 Having considered the papers filed by the parties, the relevant legal authority, and the file in this matter, the Court GRANTS the motion for the reasons set forth below. The hearing currently set for June 5, 2025 is hereby VACATED.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.