Hill
Hill v. Workday, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 ANTHONY C. HILL, Case No. 23-cv-06558-PHK Plaintiff,
v. GRANTING-IN-PART AND DENYING-
IN-PART PLAINTIFF ANTHONY C.
WORKDAY, INC., et al., HILL’S EXPEDITED REQUEST TO
STAY DISCOVERY DEADLINES
Defendants. Re: Dkt. 101 13 ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Anthony C. Hill’s motion to clarify the procedural status and stay discovery deadlines. [Dkt. 101]. Having carefully reviewed the Parties’ submissions, the Court finds this matter fit for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS-IN-PART Plaintiff Hill’s request. District courts are given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation, and control of the docket is a matter left to the discretion of the district court. Bigfoot Ventures Ltd. v. Knighton, 132 F.4th 1138, 1147 (9th Cir. 2025) (quotations omitted). While Plaintiff…