Cosmonova, LLC v. Biofilm, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 COSMONOVA, LLC, Case No. 24-cv-1453-MMA-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO STRIKE
BIOFILM, INC., et al., Defendants. [Doc. No. 27] 18 19 20 On March 26, 2025, Plaintiff Cosmonova, LLC (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion to strike Defendants Biofilm, Inc.’s and Combe, Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) answer to its first amended complaint. Doc. No. 27. Defendants filed a response in opposition, to which Plaintiff replied. Doc. Nos. 29–30. The Court found this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1, and took it under submission on April 21, 2025. Doc. No. 31. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s motion to strike. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, a distributor of…