Mullis

Mullis v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20253:24-cv-01334California3,942 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSPEH N. MULLIS, Case No.: 3:24-cv-01334-JES-MSB

Plaintiff, ORDER: v. (1) GRANTING JOINT MOTION J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO., DOES TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

TO 2, NEOLOGY INC., FRANCISCO AND STAY THE CASE;

MARTINEZ DE VELASCO, AVERY DENNISON CORP., and RICK SMITH, (2) DENYING ALL MOTIONS TO

DISMISS AS MOOT

Defendants. [ECF Nos. 28, 29, 30, 32] 18

20 Plaintiff Joseph Mullis filed the instant lawsuit against Defendants J.P. Morgan & 21 Chase Co. (“JPMC”), Neology Inc. (“Neology”), Francisco Martinez De Velasco 22 (“Velasco”), Avery Dennison Corp. (“Avery”), and Rick Smith (“Smith”) (collectively, 23 “Defendants”). On December 19, 2024, Neology and Velasco filed a motion to dismiss the 24 First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). ECF No. 29. The same day, Avery filed a motion to 25 dismiss the FAC. ECF No. 30. All Defendants also filed an omnibus motion to dismiss the 26 FAC. ECF No. 29. On December 20, 2024,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.