Jalalian
Jalalian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARMEN JALALIAN, Case No. 25-cv-01411-LJC
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
v. DISMISS
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 22 Defendants.
Before the Court are Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Chase) and Defendant Marianne Lake’s Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff Armen Jalalian’s First Amended Complaint. ECF Nos. 18, 22. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. ECF Nos. 7, 26- 27. The matter is suitable for decision without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered Defendants’ motions1 and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The dismissal is without prejudice and Plaintiff may further amend his First Amended Complaint (FAC) to address the deficiencies identified below. His Second Amended Complaint, should he choose to file one, must be filed by June 20, 2025. I. …