J.S.

J.S. v. County of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20251:23-cv-01070California471 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 J.S., et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-01070-KES-EPG Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, JOINT

STIPULATION FOR A PROTECTIVE

FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE ORDER EMPLOYEES, et al., (ECF No. 65) Defendants.

16 17 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ joint stipulation for the Court to approve 18 their proposed protective order. (ECF No. 65). Upon review, the Court will grant the stipulation 19 in part. 20 The Court finds the proposed protective order acceptable in most respects. However, the 21 Court notes that the parties define the term “‘confidential’ information or items” to mean 22 “information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c).” (Id. at 3). Such an expansive definition improperly allows the parties to deem information confidential so long as they themselves believe that it qualifies for protection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.