Huerta

Huerta v. First Solar, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20255:18-cv-06761California281 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 GEORGE HUERTA, an individual, on Case No. 18-cv-06761-BLF behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and as a representative plaintiff, we ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY UCL Plaintiff, CLAIM SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED y PURSUANT TO SONNER CSI ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS,

INC.,

a 12 Defendant.

The parties’ Joint Statement on Remaining Claims (ECF 223) indicates that the parties

|| agree on the claims remaining for trial, except with respect to Plaintiff's claim under California Business & Professions Code § 17200 et seg. (“UCL Claim”), which Defendant argues should not

= || go forward because it merely seeks unpaid wages that are the subject of other claims.

A plaintiff suing under the UCL must establish the lack of adequate remedy at law before 19 || securing equitable restitution for past harm. See Sonner v. Premier Nutrition Corp.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.