Bhandary
Bhandary v. Ghatak
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SAMITA BHANDARY, Case No. 25-cv-04464-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A
v. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
AGRADOOT GHATAK, et al., [Re: ECF No. 2] Defendants.
12 On May 27, 2025, Plaintiff Samita Bhandary (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brought suit against Defendants Agradoot Ghatak, Klearnow, Corp., Asvin Srivatsangam, Sandra Vindiola, Madan Ahluwalia, and Judge Stuart Scott in his official capacity. ECF 1 (“Compl.”). On the same day, Plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order to enjoin Defendant Agradoot Ghatak, his agents, and any officers of the Santa Clara County Superior Court from enforcing the divorce judgment entered on or about “September 18, 2025” [sic], in Bhandary v. Ghatak (Case No. 22FL000012) (“State Court Action”). See Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, ECF 2 at 9; ECF 2-1 at 3. For the reasons discussed below,…