Macomber
(PC) Cramer v. Macomber
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW B. CRAMER, Case No. 1:25-cv-00489 JLT SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING
v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND DIRECTING
JEFF MACOMBER, et al., PLAINTIFF TO PAY FILING FEE WITHIN 20 DAYS 15 Defendants. (Docs. 2, 9) 16 Matthew B. Cramer seeks to proceed in forma pauperis in this action, in which he alleges the defendants—including the CDCR director, Inspector General, the warden of Norther Kern State Prison, and several correctional officers—violated his civil rights while housed at NKSP. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff requests to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. (Doc. 2.) The magistrate judge reviewed Plaintiff’s litigation history and identified three actions that qualified as strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Doc. 9 at 2.) In addition, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff’s “allegations fail to demonstrate imminent danger of serious physical injury 24 …