Macomber

(PC) Cramer v. Macomber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20251:25-cv-00489California481 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW B. CRAMER, Case No. 1:25-cv-00489 JLT SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND DIRECTING

JEFF MACOMBER, et al., PLAINTIFF TO PAY FILING FEE WITHIN 20 DAYS 15 Defendants. (Docs. 2, 9) 16 Matthew B. Cramer seeks to proceed in forma pauperis in this action, in which he alleges the defendants—including the CDCR director, Inspector General, the warden of Norther Kern State Prison, and several correctional officers—violated his civil rights while housed at NKSP. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff requests to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. (Doc. 2.) The magistrate judge reviewed Plaintiff’s litigation history and identified three actions that qualified as strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Doc. 9 at 2.) In addition, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff’s “allegations fail to demonstrate imminent danger of serious physical injury 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.