Newsom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHAN HILL, No. 2:19-cv-1680-DJC-AC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed Objections to this Court’s Order overruling his objections to the Magistrate Judge’s order directing him to sit for a deposition on May 21, 2025. (ECF No. 158.) Therein, Plaintiff urges the Court to reconsider its Order because, as he previously argued, he did not receive proper notice of his earlier February 13, 2025, deposition which he contends requires the Court to cancel his May 21, 2025, deposition. (Id.) The Court will construe Plaintiff’s Objections as a Motion for Reconsideration. A district court has inherent power to reconsider, rescind, or modify an order for sufficient cause. United States v. Martin, 226 F.3d 1042, 1049 (9th Cir. 2000); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) (authorizing a district court to revise an interlocutory order); E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(j) (authorizing motions…