(PS) Lee v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20252:25-cv-00558California1,514 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD J. LEE, Case No. 2:25-cv-0558-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this case against defendants Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., Greg Scanlon, Richard Dangerfield, W. Hardy Callcott, Deloitte & Touche LLP, Richard A. Fieldman, and Gerald Fujimoto. He alleges that defendants violated his rights in connection with events that occurred in the late nineteen-nineties. Defendants have filed two separate motions to dismiss, ECF Nos. 7 & 10, both of which will be granted because all of plaintiff’s claims are time-barred. I will dismiss the complaint without leave to amend and deny plaintiff’s pending motions as moot.1 25 26 27 1 This case is before the undersigned pursuant to the parties’ consent. ECF Nos. 5, 26, 28, & 32; see 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Motion to Dismiss I. Legal Standards A complaint may be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.