Fuentes

(PS) Ryan v. Fuentes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 29, 20252:25-cv-00925California1,358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATASHA J. RYAN, Case No. 2:25-cv-0925-DJC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER CARLOS FUENTES, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Natasha Ryan has filed an amended complaint against the father of her children, Vincent Contreras III; David Houk, Retired Superintendent of Modest City Schools; Maria Labata, S.A.R.B Director; Dorene Sandoval, QC at Del Monte; and Petra Ortiz, a teacher at Robertson Elementary School. Plaintiff has amended her complaint to bring claims on behalf of her four children. The amended complaint fails to remedy the deficiencies of the prior screening order. However, considering plaintiff’s pro se status, I will give plaintiff one final chance to amend her complaint before recommending that this case be dismissed. Screening and Pleading Requirements A complaint must contain a short and plain statement that plaintiff is entitled to relief, 28 Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), and provide…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.